The Internet has gone on strike.

Republicans and other cultural conservatives feared the day the Internet at large and all its nodes would simultaneously collapse… we haven’t seen that happen yet, but we have seen industry collaborators get on the same page politically and take a stand against the war on civil liberties in the form of PIPA and SOPA. Who is supporting this terrible attempt at law-making? Those who don’t know that Intellectual property expires if you don’t maintain or share it, and some folks are trying to legislate their way out of that fact. The rest of us are taking a stand for what we believe is true. Information wants to be free, if you let it… and when you put a price on it, you’re essentially putting a price on your own head. The price of a troll’s head, technically.

@MCHAMMER says STOP! …. HAMMATIME

It’s no longer a secret that Elastic Provisioner, clients, partners, et. al. unanimously oppose legislation which attempts to control that which cannot be controlled… at the expense of the civil liberties which USA and other countries fought so hard for. In “america” we thought we were going to win some kind of war against drugs, but we were on them.. so we made peace with them. Now the war seems to be against online piracy. The same problem exists as before… people want drugs and pirated software, and those people are citizens… so it’s going to be very hard to control their behaviours. In fact, if we’re going to control them we’re all going to have to give up our privacy and innovation… just a little. Is it worth it? not really. The fact is that some people would prefer to make the Internet back into tubes again. I have decided to take a stand against it, and you’ll probably hear about it on twitter if you’re tuned into #STOPSOPA or #NOPIPASF or if you are attending The Silicon Valley PIPA and SOPA protest, brought to you by Hackers and Founders. If you’re taking computing personally, join us!

- Asher Bond

@PPLvPIPA: What sites are taking a stand against online erosion of civil liberties in the form of PIPA and SOPA?

Google, Inc.

WikiMedia / Wikipedia

Jimmy Wales has annouced that Wikipedia is abstaining from normal behaviour on this day of activism… unfortunately not in those words, but his were probably better. What I love about their implementation of the blackout is that their site appears to work normally until you submit a search query or click a topic, then all pages redirect to the blackout page.

The opposing political factions attack our Twitter account

This is from Tony Baldwin (one of my Diaspora friends).

Social networking software such as Diaspora‘s Aspects and now also Google+ Circles is becoming aware of users’ social contexts. Contextually-aware social networks understand, adapt to, and ideally leverage the information which humans use to relate to one another. Because humans often interact via ad-hoc channels of communication, it’s often valuable for software to adapt to these dynamic channels which have been recently created or destroyed between communicating humans. By abstracting application logic and narrowing the scope of data queries, software controllers can present more relevant views to a user based on dynamic user input or system intelligence. Often, for mobile users, social contexts are geographically based. Without requiring manual user input, software can behave more intelligently in cases where the geographic context narrows or broadens the scope of a dataset.

Is Context King?

A global positioning system in a networked mobile device can provide a narrower data scope (based on coordinate tracking) to an event handler or software controller which queries a cache of temporal data or even a larger set of persistent data. When focused views of user defined human-relational data sets intersect dynamic geospacial coordinates, systems can more efficiently learn how to provide more relevant information about changing social contexts. Moreover, this process can be done with less manual input by users. As a mobile user moves through geographic space, his or her social context may change based on the absence or presence of other people. As distributed systems and social networks become more aware of frequently changing, subtle, geographic social contexts… it becomes increasingly possible (assuming the information is shared with users) for users to find places and people based on their interests. From a social perspective, it’s really quite empowering to have this much abstraction between a venue and a place. There are a lot of “cloud” companies around these days, but in order to really specialize in abstraction one must understand what becomes the focus instead of that which we abstract. The focus is where the actual power (value) comes from. In this case the power is in the ability to become less reliant upon physical, geographic constraints and more focused on social interests (whether more or less sophisticated) and more focused on relateable interactions.

For example, if Barack Obama is in town, perhaps I’d like to invite him as a guest to an upcoming local or regional event. If not, perhaps I’d like the system to invite the next person who might be interested (in this example… Tom Anderson, my first Myspace friend). The system can know (often based on what’s probably voluntary user input) that Rick Perry isn’t as interested in this particular event (perry-wink)… even though both Rick Perry and Barack Obama may exist in the same or similar regional space at the same time. But fortunately I still have my friend Tom. The converging technologies (big/aggregate data abstraction, mobile computing, geospacial contextualization, and social contextualization) are not so new when standing alone, but when integrated support a trend of social sophistication which is more agnostic of physical infrastructure and places where it exists. If I had to summarize this sophistication in one word it would probably be “freedom.”

Skeptics might argue that they don’t like the idea of software or systems knowing more about them. Skeptics might also argue that they don’t like knowing << unpleasant fact(s) >>. Often, an unpleasantness (fear) is associated with aggregation of knowledge within a technological or otherwise sophisticated framework. You could call it a “fear of singularity” or “fear of robots taking children somewhere else” … but this year and probably next year I’m likely to be more afraid of ignorance than artificial, collective, or social intelligence. Knowledge is power, computers are tools, and the more they know about us the more we can know about ourselves. Privacy is important and made possible if encryption and private ownership of data is made possible. You are free to navigate your social context. Is your data? Is “your” data your data?

Peep the Context.